Analysis: This GOP senator just admitted what we’ve all known about the party for a while
“When I saw General Mattis’ comments yesterday I felt like perhaps we are getting to a point where we can be more honest with the concerns that we might hold internally and have the courage of our own convictions to speak up.”
Make no mistake what Murkowski is acknowledging here: that many of her fellow Republicans — and, presumably, her colleagues in the Senate — have long held deep doubts about Trump and his conduct, but have lacked the courage of their convictions to speak out about those worries.
This is, of course, something we’ve long known or at least long strongly suspected about the many elected GOP leaders in Congress. That if given truth serum — or, more likely in the nation’s capital, given the chance to speak without their names attached to the quotes — a majority of those congressional Republicans would express something that lands between doubt and utter terror about the way the President conducts himself and what it means for the future of the party.
What Murkowski is hoping, in raw political terms, is that Mattis’ credibility and the high esteem in which he is held by many Republicans will serve as a sort of tipping point. If Mattis is willing to say what he thinks about Trump, then why shouldn’t I? That sort of thing.
The early returns are, uh, not promising.
(Side rant: How the hell is Portman’s answer — and he’s far from alone in this — an acceptable answer for a UNITED STATES SENATOR? Like, Portman is sooooo busy that he can’t make time to read what Mattis wrote? It’s a statement, not “War and Peace.” And it seems like the former secretary of defense criticizing the President for lacking any instinct to bring the country together feels like sort of a big story that a senator should be aware of?)
The reason for this sort of hear-no-evil, see-no-evil, speak-no-evil approach by the vast majority of Senate Republicans to the Mattis statement is, put plainly, political cowardice.
And so, with very limited exceptions — Murkowski, Amash and Utah Sen. Mitt Romney being the most prominent — almost no senator or House member has dared step out of line.
Not because they agree with Trump. But because they apparently value getting reelected — or at least not having to beat back a Trump-inspired primary challenge — more than they care about, in Murkowski’s words, “the courage of our own convictions.”
THE POINT — NOW ON YOUTUBE!
In each episode of his weekly YouTube show, Chris Cillizza will delve a little deeper into the surreal world of politics. Click to subscribe!
After all, some of Trump’s most vocal critics within the party have, with no real explanation as to why, pivoted into his most ardent defenders.
What explains that transformation, if not pure political calculation? The answer is, well, you know what the answer is.
History very rarely looks back kindly on those who put personal political gain and ambition over doing what they know is right. At some point — whether next year or in early 2025 — Trump will no longer be President. Or the leader of the Republican Party. And on that day — and a lot of days after it — Republican elected officials will have to look back at the past four or eight years and ask themselves whether they stood on the “courage of their convictions” or the cravenness of their political aspirations.
At the moment, that bit of introspection will likely leave a large majority of Republicans wishing they had taken a very different course.
