Richmond mayor invokes emergency powers to remove Confederate statues from city
Crews could be seen preparing to remove the Jackson statue Wednesday afternoon, as scores of onlookers watched the monument honoring the late slave owner who fought to preserve slavery begin to come down after standing in the city for more than 100 years.
The move by Mayor Levar Stoney, who did not identify the other statues he plans to remove from Richmond — the former capital of the Confederacy — comes as a number of cities and states have in recent weeks been removing statues and other symbols that honor Confederate leaders amid a national reckoning with America’s racist past.
“It is past time,” Levar said in an address. “As the capital city of Virginia, we have needed to turn this page for decades. And today, we will.”
The mayor also cited the “threat to public safety” some of the city’s statues pose as a reason for using his powers. Protesters in recent days have attempted to bring them down themselves in scenes that authorities warn could be dangerous.
Virginia became a focal point around the nationwide debate about removing Confederate monuments in 2017, after one person was killed and 19 others were injured in Charlottesville when white supremacists and neo-Nazis protested the removal of a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee.
The move by Stoney comes on the same day that a state law went into effect that gives localities the ability to remove or alter Confederate monuments in their communities. The measure outlines a process for a potential removal, including public notice and a public hearing. It also says once a city votes for removal, “for a period of 30 days, offer the monument or memorial for relocation and placement to any museum, historical society, government, or military battlefield.”
Richmond City Councilwoman Kimberly Gray, a Democrat who is challenging Stoney’s reelection bid, said Wednesday that she is in favor of the monument removals, but criticized the mayor’s move, telling CNN she is concerned it could lead to costly lawsuits.
“I’m all about moving forward and they need to be gone, but all I see is price tags and legal papers — we’re going to be hit with lawsuits tomorrow,” said Gray.
The lawsuit says its removal would adversely affect the plaintiffs by nullifying the neighborhood’s status as a National Historic Landmark district, resulting in “the loss of favorable tax treatment and reduction in property values.”
CNN’s Taylor Romine, Evan Simko-Bednarski, Ryan Nobles and Veronica Stracqualursi contributed to this report.
