Paul Burrell slams Prince Harry over US interviews saying he’s ‘blinded’ by Meghan Markle
Paul Burrell slams Prince Harry over ‘dirty laundry’ US interviews saying he’s ‘blinded’ by Meghan Markle and that Princess Diana ‘would be heartbroken it’s come to this’
- Princess Diana’s former butler Paul Burrell said the late royal would be ‘heartbroken’ by disintegrating relations between Prince Harry and the royals
- Burrell’s comments come days after Prince Harry dropped another nuclear ‘truth bomb’ on the Royal Family accusing them of ‘total silence’ and ‘neglect’
- ‘Truth bombs’ have seen Harry claim his father Prince Charles made him ‘suffer’ as a child in his new series for Apple, The Me You Can’t See
Princess Diana‘s former butler Paul Burrell has said the late royal would be ‘heartbroken’ by Prince Harry airing ‘dirty laundry’ in a series of recent US interviews.
Paul Burrell, 62, told Closer Magazine that he hopes Harry, 36, will stop giving the ‘truth bomb’ interviews that have followed since the royals first spoke to Oprah Winfrey in March this year.
The former royal aide said recent revelations by the Duke of Sussex in his new series for Apple, The Me You Can’t See, and The Armchair Podcast were self-destructive.
Scroll down for video
The former royal aide, who worked for Princess Diana when Prince Harry was a child, said recent revelations by the Duke of Sussex in his new series for Apple, The Me You Can’t See, and The Armchair Podcast were self-destructive (Harry pictured during filming of The Me You Can’t See)
Princess Diana ‘s former butler Paul Burrell has said the late royal would be ‘heartbroken’ by Prince Harry airing ‘dirty laundry’ in a series of recent US interviews.
Burrell’s comments come days after Prince Harry dropped another nuclear ‘truth bomb’ on the Royal Family accusing them of ‘total silence’ and ‘neglect’ when Meghan was suicidal.
He claimed his father Prince Charles made him ‘suffer’ as a child and insisted he would not be ‘bullied into silence’ when he alleged ‘The Firm’ ‘trapped’, smeared and dumped them.
Burrell said: ‘He’s been blinded by Meghan, by her beauty and by this Hollywood world.
‘I think now it could only be Meghan who can stop him from doing these interviews and doing any more damage, and destroying himself.
‘He won’t heal if he keeps doing this — it’ll make things worse in the long run.I honestly have no idea when he’ll stop.’
The bombshell Meghan and Harry Oprah Winfrey interview in March – Burrell said the late Princess Diana would be ‘devastated that Harry is cut off from his family, but she’d disapprove of him tearing down the royals’
Speaking about how the late Diana, Princess of Wales would view Harry and Meghan’s tell-all approach, he said he thought she would be ‘heartbroken it’s come to this.
He said: ‘Diana would be heartbroken it’s come to this. Not only would she be devastated that Harry is cut off from his family, but she’d disapprove of him tearing down the royals.
‘She’d want him to stop airing his dirty laundry, and to live a quiet, private life, focused on his children.’
Burrell has been speaking out about the current state of the royal family, appearing on Lorraine last week
In recent candid interviews, the Duke of Sussex said he and his wife felt abandoned by his relatives and this was one of their ‘biggest reasons’ for leaving for California last year.
He told Oprah: ‘Certainly now I will never be bullied into silence’, adding: ‘I thought my family would help, but every single ask, request, warning, whatever it is, just got met with total silence, total neglect.
‘We spent four years trying to make it work. We did everything that we possibly could to stay there and carry on doing the role and doing the job. But Meghan was struggling.’
He added: ‘That feeling of being trapped within the family, there was no option to leave.
Eventually when I made that decision for my family, I was still told, “You can’t do this”, And it’s like, “Well how bad does it have to get until I am allowed to do this?”. She [Meghan] was going to end her life. It shouldn’t have to get to that.’