Analysis: Andrew Cuomo’s utterly disastrous response to the AG report findings
Why? Well, for several reasons. Let’s go through them.
1. The sympathy ploy: Cuomo transparently tried to curry sympathy with New Yorkers by explaining away his crossing of the line of appropriateness with a former staffer named Charlotte Bennett, saying it reminded him of a family member’s experience with sexual assault. (Bennett had told Cuomo she had been a victim of sexual assault.) “This young woman brought it all back. She’s about the same age. I thought I had learned a lot about the issue from my family’s experience,” Cuomo said by way of explanation. “I thought I could help her work through a difficult time. I did ask her questions I don’t normally ask people.”
Using your family as a shield is gross under any circumstance — although Cuomo is far from the first politician to do it — but especially because what Bennett alleges is that Cuomo asked her if she was monogamous or ever had relationships with older men. That doesn’t seem like the caring adult that Cuomo is trying to cast himself as.
2. He totally flip-flopped on the credibility of the James investigation: Back in March, when it seemed that a new allegation against Cuomo surfaced daily, he used the James investigation to stay in office. “I ask the people of this state to wait for the facts from the attorney general’s report before forming an opinion,” Cuomo said back then.
But on Tuesday, Cuomo was running down the investigation as a “biased review” of the facts of the case. Later he offered this: “Politics and bias are interwoven throughout every aspect of this situation.”
If Cuomo is ultimately impeached, his, um, performance on Tuesday — and especially the hugging and kissing montage — could well be the tipping point for legislators who were previously on the fence about whether to remove him from office. Not only was Cuomo entirely unrepentant, the entire response felt deeply tone deaf — the actions of a very powerful man who still doesn’t get it.