Health: Very premature or low birth weight babies are more likely to have a lower IQ as adults
Very premature and very low birth weight babies are more likely to have a lower IQ as adults — losing an average of 12 points, study shows
- Experts from the University of Warwick analysed data from eight past studies
- This included adult IQ test results from 2,135 people born between 1978-1995
- Those born either very preterm or very low birth weight had an average IQ of 88
- This is 12 points less than the average for those who were instead born full term
- Very preterm/low birth weight kids may need education support, the team said
Adults are more likely to have a lower IQ if they were born either very preterm (at 28–32 weeks) or with a very low birth weight (less than 3.3 lbs), a study has found.
University of Warwick experts compared data on the outcomes of full term (37–41 weeks) and either very- preterm or low birth weight births from eight past studies.
They found that adults were likely to have 12 IQ points less if they were born very prematurely or underweight as compared to their peers born at full term.
The findings build on previous work that concluded that very preterm or low birth weight babies tend to have lower levels of cognitive performance in childhood.
This, the team suggests, indicates that very preterm or low birth weight children may require additional educational support to boost their learning.
Adults are more likely to have a lower IQ if they were born either very preterm (at 28–32 weeks) or with a very low birth weight (< 53 ounces), a study has found. Pictured: a preterm baby
‘Being born very preterm or at a very low birthweight continues to have a highly significant long term impact on the average IQ,’ said paper author and psychologist Robert Eves of the University of Warwick.
In their study, Mr Eves and colleagues analysed data on 2,135 people who were born between 1978-1995 and who also had their IQ assessed between the ages of 18–30.
Of these subjects, 1068 were born very preterm or with a very low birth weight — while the remaining 1067 were born full term and served as controls.
The data was sourced from eight previous cohort studies — covering five European countries as well as Australia and New Zealand.
‘The multi cohort, international aspect of this research can especially give us confidence in this important finding,’ noted Mr Eves.
The team found that individuals that were born either very preterm or very low birth weight scored an average IQ of 88 — 12 points less than their full term peers.
Such a difference between the groups remained high — at 9.8 IQ points — even when the team removed those adults who had a childhood learning disability or neurosensory impairment (regarded as having a childhood IQ score below 70).
According to the team, the risk factors associated with lower IQ performance included severe lung problems (or ‘bronchopulmonary dysplasia’), neonatal bleeds into the brain (so-called ‘intraventricular haemorrhage) and lower-educated mothers.
‘While most born very preterm or very low birth weight show cognitive development within the normal range, many may benefit from better tailored early interventions,’ said paper author and psychologist Dieter Wolke, also of Warwick.
‘These may include reducing bronchopulmonary dysplasia and intraventricular haemorrhage in neonatal care and educational interventions of those born into socially disadvantaged families.’
The full findings of the study were published in the journal JAMA Pediatrics.
