What is REALLY going to happen with Covid cases this winter?

View
comments

Covid cases will plummet next month without the Government’s winter ‘Plan B’ because the virus will run out of people to infect, independent experts said today as they waded into a row about how the epidemic will unfold in the coming months.  

Optimistic scientists expect that a combination of the booster vaccine rollout and rising natural immunity in children will lead to a ‘substantial and rapid’ fall in cases, hospitalisations and deaths, without the need for compulsory face masks, working from home and vaccine passports. 

The trajectory of the epidemic this winter has divided No10’s own scientific advisory panel SAGE, with several key members publicly lobbying for more restrictions to safeguard the NHS from being overwhelmed in the coming months.

But many of the scenarios forecasted by the group’s modelling teams have daily cases plunging over the coming weeks to as low as 5,000, even if the virus is allowed to spread unchecked. 

The unusually optimistic modelling has given ministers the confidence to reject growing calls for them to revert to Plan B. 

Professor Paul Hunter, an infectious diseases expert at the University of East Anglia, threw his support behind the modelling, telling MailOnline he expects a ‘substantial and rapid fall’ in the epidemic in the coming weeks. 

He said the booster vaccines will top up half of the population’s immunity, adding: ‘The boosters are working much better than we first thought they would.’

And children, who are responsible for the recent surge, will have acquired significant natural and jab-induced protection, according to Cambridge University epidemiologist Dr Raghib Ali. 

The half-term school holiday — which for many schools started today — will act as a mini firebreaker and bring down cases further, experts believe. 

Yet other scientists have warned it is impossible to accurately predict how the outbreak will unfold and that Plan B measures — such as WFH guidance and face masks — should be brought back now to control rising infections just in case.  

Professor Martin McKee, a public health expert based at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said he would be ‘very cautious about making firm Christmas arrangements’ because of the ‘high’ number of cases and emergence of the AY.4.2 variant which appears ‘more transmissible than Delta’.  

Britain’s daily Covid cases last week breached 50,000, marking a three-month high. At the height of the second wave last winter, there were more than 80,000 positive tests. But infections yesterday fell for the first time in nearly three weeks  — adding more confusion to the argument, 

In a bid to avoid another national lockdown, ministers are following ‘Plan A’, which focuses on boosters, jabbing 12 to 15-year-olds and a successful flu vaccine roll-out.

Boris Johnson last week rejected calls from the NHS and scientists to implement ‘Plan B’, which includes vaccine passports, masks and WFH. It is reserved for when the health service comes under ‘unsustainable’ pressure. 

Ministers were also said to have discussed a ‘Plan C’ if all else fails, which could include banning mixing between households. 

Modelling for SAGE from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) shows cases could fall to 5,000 per day over Christmas after the virus runs out of steam among younger people who are driving the current high case numbers levels.

Professor Hunter, who wasn’t involved in the projections but agreed with them, said: ‘Over the next couple weeks we should start seeing a substantial fall in cases followed ten days to two weeks by hospitalisations. Then another fortnight after that I expect a fall in deaths.

‘It’s because of immunity. What we’re seeing at the moment is a substantial number of cases in children, very high rates indeed, and that can’t go on for much longer. The virus is running out of non-immune people to infect.’

He added: ‘The other thing is over 93 per cent adults have got antibodies [according to ONS estimates], and while antibodies aren’t the only factor in immunity, they are a pretty good marker.’

Professor Hunter said he doesn’t expect cases to fall as rapidly as those estimates because the modelling did not take into account AY4.2, which evidence suggests is up to 15 per cent more infectious than its predecessor. It now makes up almost one in 10 infections across England. 

He added: ‘Even if the fall isn’t as rapid as the LSHTM model, it still raises the question: what’s the point of having more restrictions?

‘Plan B measures are effective to certain extent — mask wearing for example we predict can reduce transmission by 10 to 20 per cent. But what they do is delay. Last year, delaying was crucial to buy us time to develop better treatments and vaccines.

‘If the LSHTM model is correct and by Christmas we have very low levels of Covid around then what’s the point? Why would we want to increase restrictions?’

Meanwhile, Cambridge University epidemiologist Dr Raghib Ali told MailOnline he also expects the three Covid measurements to begin dropping next month.

He said: ‘I am confident all three will fall but I’m not confident cases will get down to 5,000 per day [as suggested by LSHTM’s model].

‘This is due to a combination of several factors – firstly, we’ve seen as cases rise, people change their behaviour. We saw it in July [after the Euro 2020 surge] and in previous waves, people start to take better care, possibly wear masks more and this is especially true in older people who are higher risk.

‘Then you’ve got the combination of the vaccine programme in teenagers and a build-up of natural immunity in primary and secondary school-aged children.’ 

The rollout of a single dose of the Pfizer jab to 12 to 15-year-olds began last month but only around two in 10 have been jabbed in England.

Speaking about the power of natural immunity, Dr Ali said: ‘One of the interesting things is despite London having the lowest rates of vaccination in the country, it also has the lowest rates of Covid.

‘It’s hard to think of any reason for that other than high levels of immunity from previous waves of the pandemic.

‘The third factor is obviously booster doses, data in Israel and the UAE shows they are very effective at bringing down all three things – hospitalisations, deaths and cases.’

Some 5.2million boosters have already been dished out in England, but there are concerns the sluggish rollout is not moving fast enough.

But hopes were raised last night that Britain could avoid another winter health crisis, as data from Israel shows booster jabs can significantly reduce cases and hospitalisations. 

Dr Ali dismissed calls for the Government to revert to Plan B, adding: ‘If respectable teams [like the LSHTM] are now predicting cases coming down next month, then there’s no need for restrictions.

‘I’m certainly not encouraging people not to wear a mask, I wear a mask myself, but I don’t think it needs to be mandated. I encourage everyone to take care, wear a mask – particularly around high-risk people.

‘But I just don’t think mandating it [Plan B] would make much difference. What we all want to do is to reduce cases, hospital rates and deaths. I’m not convinced masks will, but boosters do. 

 

‘And I think there is a danger that if the public feel that all these restrictions are coming in then they might not feel they need to get booster doses, so the emphasis rightly needs to be on boosters.’

Dr Ali called for half a million doses of booster vaccines to be rolled out each day and for the gap between second and third doses to be shortened from six to five months.

He added: ‘I want to see all nine priority cohorts vaccinated with a booster by the Christmas holidays.’ 

But Professor McKee, from LSHTM, told MailOnline that despite SAGE models offering ‘high quality estimates of what might happen’ there are ‘many unknowns’ going into winter, including how people adapt their behaviour.  

He said: ‘We saw this when the (Immensa Health Clinic) laboratory scandal that affected the South West falsely led to people who were infected being told they were not, so they did not take precautions and cases surged.’

Plan B needs to be implemented to avoid another lockdown and ‘dithering and delay’ on imposing less-stringent restrictions makes a lockdown more likely, he said.

Professor McKee added: ‘The recent estimates [of 5,000 cases a day by LSHTM] may turn out to be right but, given the consequences if they are wrong, I would be very cautious.

‘It’s very difficult to say what could happen by Christmas, not least because we now have a new variant that seems to be more transmissible than Delta.’

He said: ‘However, infections are already at a very high level, far above that when other countries impose greater restrictions. So it’s now obvious decisions on restrictions in England are made on political rather than scientific grounds. 

‘I would be very cautious about making firm arrangements for Christmas.’

Professor Stephen Reicher, a member of the independent Scientific Pandemic Insights group SPI-B which feeds into SAGE, told MailOnline making predictions about infection levels is a ‘notoriously inaccurate pastime’. 

Efforts should instead focus on what can be done to bring cases down, he said.

Professor Reicher said the key ways of reducing infections are behavioural — increasing vaccine uptake, limiting contacts, including by working from home, increasing ventilation and ensuring infected people self-isolate. 

To do this, ‘clear and consistent messaging about the need to bring infections down and how to do so’ is needed, he said. 

‘Now the messaging is all over the place, often inaccurate, and even suggesting that infections don’t matter… at which point why do anything,’ he said.

The frame of the discussion also needs to be changed because if ‘all Covid measures sound negative’ then ‘you put people off the sensible interventions’ that protect them and increase their choice.

He added: ‘In other words, the level of infections, hospitalisations and deaths is up to all of us. 

‘But “all of us” must include the Government providing the information, the protections and the support we need to do the right thing. And they aren’t.’