Wedding guest frustrated after being sent a VERY strict dress code by the bride and groom
Is this wedding dress code too strict? Guest is shocked after being sent a list of rules by the bride and groom – and told she’ll be refused entry if she doesn’t comply
- A wedding guest has shared the ‘strictly enforced’ dress code she was sent
- The bride and groom uploaded the details to their special website with clauses
- Men had to wear suit pants with a white button down shirt and a solid colour tie
- While the ladies had to wear a dress no longer than knee length and no florals
- Many who saw the lengthy list of demands said they would rather not attend
By Matilda Rudd For Daily Mail Australia
Published: 21:04 EDT, 22 July 2020 | Updated: 02:06 EDT, 23 July 2020
Poll
Do you think this dress code is going ‘too far’?
- Yes, it’s too restrictive 345 votes
- No, it’s fair 58 votes
Now share your opinion
A wedding guest has shared the ‘strictly enforced’ dress code a bride and groom sent her before the big day, frustrated by the lengthy list of rules.
The woman, who anonymously posted in a wedding shaming Facebook group, said that she was excited to be invited to the nuptials of a friend’s son but was shocked when she saw the list of restrictions.
While the invitation said the dress code had to be complied with, the woman wasn’t worried until she logged onto their website to read through the details.
For the gentleman attending, black or navy suit pants were the only option.
The woman, who anonymously posted in a wedding shaming Facebook group, said that she was excited to be invited to the nuptials of ‘the son of one of the physicians I work with’ (stock image)
While the invitation said the dress code had to be complied with, the woman wasn’t worried until she logged onto their website to read through the details (pictured)
‘No tuxedos, no jeans, no khakis. They can’t be any shade of grey either,’ the website read.
White button down shirts were the only tops accepted and they were forbidden from wearing any type of pattern.
‘Suit coats must be worn. No grey, black or navy only,’ the list continued.
Ties had to be of a ‘solid colour’ only and couldn’t be grey, white, ivory, mauve or sage.
Things were made a little more simple for the ladies who simply had to wear a dress, with jumpers and pant suits barred from the formal occasion.
‘Dresses must be no longer than knee length. They can’t be white, ivory, white with a floral pattern, black, beige, black with a pattern, mauve, sage or any form of grey,’ it read.
Anyone who doesn’t follow the rules wouldn’t be admitted into the wedding.
‘Dresses must be no longer than knee length. They can’t be white, ivory, white with a floral pattern, black, beige, black with a pattern, mauve, sage or any form of grey,’ it read (stock image)
Those who read her post were infuriated by the restrictions and said it was cause the decline the invitation.
‘I guess the only way to go is naked then,’ joked one person.
‘This is cringy. It implies their family/friends don’t know how to dress for a wedding without having it spelled out for them. Also wtf is “no longer than knee length?” Do they want to see Great Aunt Mildred in a miniskirt?’ Said another.
A third added: ‘RSVP yes and show up in exactly what she didn’t want so she turns you away but has to pay for your place anyway’.